Differentiation
Digitalization, electrification, and regulation are making premium vehicles feel more alike and making brand character harder to keep legible in the product.
Big Questions
Connected Brand Big Questions
Earning the Porsche Premium
Can Porsche’s higher-volume range continue to earn Porsche pricing and meaningful scale as digital experience, electrification, practical fundamentals, and local-market fit become more important?
Where it stands
Porsche’s practical models are losing ground even as key U.S. rivals grow. Greater powertrain flexibility and selective China localization may help, but the broader range must still prove it can sustain meaningful demand at Porsche prices.
Read the full Big Question →
Technology as New Mercedes-ness
Can Mercedes make technology feel like a new and lasting expression of Mercedes luxury—or will democratized technology and accelerating imitation make the brand more interchangeable?
Where it stands
Mercedes’ new BEVs are gaining traction in Europe, suggesting technology is again becoming a recognizable expression of Mercedes luxury. In China, CLA L shoppers criticized driver assistance, voice response, and interface design; the electric GLC L is the next test.
Read the full Big Question →
Trust and Customer Contract
Can Tesla preserve the tolerance premium that lets it move faster and ask more of customers than a conventional automaker?
Where it stands
Tesla’s tolerance premium appears to survive, but it now depends more on present-tense product and value than mission belief; the open test is whether repeated customer friction exhausts it.
Read the full Big Question →
Automotive Execution
After the Model S invention wave and Model 3/Y scale wave, can Tesla keep the car product compelling in an execution phase it no longer monopolizes?
Where it stands
Model Y extensions are producing near-term strength, but they do not yet show Tesla can sustain a competitive broader lineup; the test is how seriously Tesla invests to defend its lead as competition intensifies.
Read the full Big Question →
Luxury Claim
Can Genesis turn distinctive design, product character, and Korean hospitality into a coherent luxury identity that compounds across product cycles and earns durable loyalty and pricing power beyond individual product wins?
Where it stands
Genesis has a credible design-led luxury proposition, and the GV90 shows it can carry concept ambition into a production flagship. But an aging, concentrated core lineup and missing hybrids leave broader coherence, loyalty, and pricing power dependent on the rest of the next cycle.
Read the full Big Question →
Sustainable Differentiation
Can BMW continue to command a premium through exceptional balance while preserving driving pleasure as its organizing principle?
Where it stands
BMW’s differentiation remains intact: exceptional balance supports strong demand, while driving pleasure keeps the lineup recognizably BMW. But pricing power remains unproven. Neue Klasse must preserve that character as shared technology and regulation make premium vehicles feel increasingly alike.
Read the full Big Question →
Articles
Signs of Digital Interior Maturity
Clean-sheet designs let BMW, Mercedes, and Porsche show what more fully realized digital interiors look like
Rivian and Genesis Push the Extremes
Different ways young brands are building an enthusiast edge
Watch List
Ferrari Uses Software to Sell a Sharper-Handling Purosangue
Car and Driver drove the Ferrari Purosangue Handling Speciale and was both impressed with and surprised at the handling improvements that came from software alone:
That’s right: The Purosangue HS achieves its speciale handling with no new parts in the suspension. It even rides on the same Pirelli P Zero summer tires (sized 255/35R-22 in front and 315/30R-23 at the rear) as your blue-collar neighbor’s base Purosangue. Thanks to the Purosangue’s TrueActive Spool Valve (TASV) adaptive dampers—sourced from race shop and occasional Ford GT builders Multimatic—Ferrari is able to sharpen the Handling Speciale’s responses with just a little bit of new software. By spinning a 48-volt electric motor to drive a ball screw in line with each damper, the TASV suspension varies damping force and adjusts ride height at each corner individually 20 times every second. Rewriting the code governing how the TASV dampers behave reduces the Purosangue’s body movement by a claimed 10 percent.
The only hardware that differentiates the Handling Speciale is cosmetic: dark-gray wheels with diamond-cut accents, an interior plaque, carbon-fiber shields, matte-black exhaust tips, and revised badge finishes. The package’s pricing hasn’t been announced, but C/D said it’s rumored to be $50,000.
Some percentage of Ferrari clients will almost certainly pay for this package. People complain about the idea of paying extra for software that changes what the same hardware can do, but as they did with computer and phone apps and subscription services, many may acclimate if they find the experience valuable. Ferrari will be able to charge more without adding much hardware cost, while the rest of the industry can point to an example of how much is being charged for what is mostly a software upgrade.
GM Makes More Room for CarPlay in Its New Trucks
General Motors is integrating Apple Inc.’s CarPlay in its latest infotainment system, three years after upsetting some consumers by eliminating the popular interface from its electric vehicles.
The new system will allow drivers to use CarPlay or Google’s Android Auto on a split screen that also shows key vehicle gauges such as fuel, tire pressure, Super Cruise hands-free driving and towing information. In addition, the system enables the driver to use vehicle functions and phone apps with less toggling between screens.
There are many reasons to resist CarPlay: control over the experience, integration across the car’s components and subsystems, and control over the customer relationship.
But customers generally expect CarPlay, and only a small number of players have gotten away with not supporting it.
Tesla and Rivian are two of them. The common threads: both brands are significantly differentiated, to the point where a meaningful number of customers will accept the trade-offs, and both have strong, deeply integrated in-house tech stacks.